Determining why a specific location is targeted requires an analysis of the intelligence cycle used during the mission planning phase. In many instances, targeting decisions are based on signals intelligence (SIGINT) or human intelligence (HUMINT) that identifies a specific individual as a high value target. If that individual is present at a meeting, the location may be flagged for a kinetic strike regardless of the venue's primary function.
Targeting criteria often rely on pattern of life analysis. This involves tracking movements and communications to predict future locations. If intelligence suggests that a meeting involves the coordination of hostile activities, the site may be classified as a legitimate military objective under specific rules of engagement. This can lead to situations where civilian or legal infrastructure is hit because the data indicated the presence of combatants or imminent threats.
Errors in intelligence often stem from misidentification or faulty data interpretation. In some cases, the distinction between a legitimate military meeting and a professional legal gathering may become blurred in electronic surveillance. When the data indicates a high probability of a threat, the decision to strike is made based on the perceived immediate necessity of neutralizing that specific target.
